News
It was all in the timing at the S-GI Board meeting
Thursday February 23, 2012 | By:Lizz Schumer

He explained the projected trajectory for budget decisions and reiterated that, under budget plan A, which is the plan the board is currently working with, the district still has to come up with approximately $300,000 in deficit funds. While Connelly said he is confident the district will be able to make it this year, his concerns are longer-ranging.
“We’ve gotta think three years ahead. If the tax cap continues, we will outpace ourselves,” Connelly said. “I’m not sure how much longer we can continue to do this.”
As far as deciding what to cut and how, Connelly presented a chart that broke down each step of the budget procedure, showing the budget process to be several months ahead of last year’s proceedings. A consensus on a basic budget plan was not reached until March 29 last year. This year, that consensus came on Jan. 31. Clarifying a position reduction plan and rolling out a retirement incentive plan was set for Feb. 16 this year, compared to March 15 of last year.
“We’re trying to be ahead and trying to move forward. Let’s get this baby rockin’ and rollin’,” said Connelly. “As difficult as it is, we all have to settle in and do what we have to do to move forward.”
The difficult part of the process, Connelly continued, is the still-fluid tax cap levy delineated by the state comptroller.
“It’s changing day by day, and we’ll continue to jump through hoops trying to stay alive,” Connelly said, noting that the tax cap is hovering around 2 percent, although that number is still not exact. “We’re trying to cut as close to the bone as we can, so that next year, S-GI will still be standing,” Connelly said.
Several board members addressed concerns they had with the budget and the process itself, including Board Member Jeremiah Kane, who said he was still in favor of looking at a tax cap levy higher than 2 percent, as well as making sure the public knows how much of the budget is beyond the board’s control.
“If we continue to have every interest group come up and tell us what they want to do, there’s no way we’ll get this done. My understanding is that we have to get the information, get it to the public and that’s it,” Kane said.
“The board has to take some leadership ... the legislature is made up of lunatics and sociopaths and they have tied our hands. If we don’t want to destroy our programs, we’re still going to have to look beyond the cap,” Kane continued.
Board Member Joan Kelly noted “some disparity” between student interest and the programs chosen to be cut or reduced. Kelly said she hoped that the decision regarding which classes are set to be offered would be a student-driven decision.
Board Vice President Delia Bonenberger agreed. “Kids should be able to say what they want to take,” she said. “We should be able to offer a majority of those things.”
High School Principal Vince Vanderlip assured Kelly and the rest of the board that he would try to offer answers regarding what programs the administration was examining. He also clarified that, in the case of Advanced Placement courses, the administration was looking at cutting sections of courses, not the offerings themselves.
“We’re going to be putting the classes on rotation. We’re going to still be offering the same classes, just not as many sections,” Vanderlip explained.
Elaine Rinfrette, a college teacher and district resident, voiced her concerns regarding AP courses, following information she heard at the Erie County Association of School Boards Legislative Breakfast, which several board members and the superintendent also attended.
At that meeting, representatives from the legislature heard concerns from school districts about mandate relief, fairness in funding and sustaining the education system in New York state.
Jean Ranney, ECASB legislative team leader and executive board member said, at the meeting, “There is a standard process for school districts when money is tight: cut staff, cut programs, spend down the fund balance. After three years of frozen state aid, last year’s mid-year state aid cut, the expiration of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, federal funds and now the end of [the] education jobs funds and implementation of the local tax levy limit, we have reached a point where we can’t cut our way to a solution. We are only cutting our school districts further into decline.”
Several of the legislators present at the meeting noted that the governor’s office had planned hearings for entities to report on mandated relief, to encourage the governor to consider the strain the tax cap levy and lack of mandated relief is putting on school districts, particularly in the area of providing well-rounded programs.
Rinfrette, who said she attended the meeting as a “concerned citizen,” brought her perspective back to the S-GI Board for the members to address.
“I attended the legislative breakfast ... on Saturday [Feb. 11],” said Rinfrette. “Just providing mandated courses will not provide the best education for our students. It is imperative that we have a district that values success.”
Connelly assured Rinfrette that S-GI will be offering AP courses, just on a smaller scale.
“There’s a distinction between sections and courses. It’s not that we’re not offering the courses, just that the sections won’t be as regular,” Connelly said. “We know it’s important and we’re doing our best to toe the line.”
Business Administrator Ted Welch reported that he was focusing on numerical projections and “securing the last numbers we need” to determine the exact figures that go into budget calculations. He said that the administration met with the teacher’s union to discuss the retirement incentive plan, and that it was the intention to give employees approximately one month for the return of commitments. He asked for those to be in by March 16.
As the budget process moves forward, Connelly said that he plans to clarify the position reduction plan, then share the retirement incentive offering and determine the exact numbers the board and administration have to work with as a final budget plan is created, including expenditures and revenues, state aid and the statewide tax cap. The presentation, along with background information on the budget process as a whole, is available on the S-GI District website, www.springvillegi.org, under the “board of directors” tab.
Resident Lori Ploetz spoke on her concerns over half-empty S-GI school buses.
“I’m always concerned when I see a bus pull out and there’s only [a few] students on the bus,” Ploetz said, asking if there was some way to consolidate services.
Connelly responded that, legally, the district is required to provide ridership for every student, but that many students do not take advantage of the service.
“Make your kids get on the cheese. It’s that simple,” Connelly responded. “Put your kids on the bus; you’re paying for it.”
Williams added that a single bus run time had been considered in the past and that it would continue to remain on the board’s radar for discussion.
Connelly said he did not want to give an exact date on when employees would know whether or not their positions may be in jeopardy, but that the board and the administration would all be presented with that information at the same time.
“There’s been an awful lot of speculation, but we really don’t know how it’s all going to play out,” Connelly said. “What I do know is that we’re providing a very comparable program to all of our neighbors. We had a very rich program, which is wonderful, but the economy just can’t support it anymore.”
In other board news:
- The board rescheduled the April 10 meeting to April 17 and canceled the April 24 meeting, to be reinstated as needed if the budget process requires additional meeting time.
- The board adopted a revised 2012-13 budget development calendar.
- A grant in the amount of $1,000 from the Reid Family Foundation, to benefit the science and math departments in the amount of $500 each, was accepted.
- The board accepted the report of examination performed by the office of the New York state comptroller for the period of July 1, 2008 through Aug. 5, 2011.
- The following policies were approved for a first reading: Response to Intervention, The Role of the Board in Implementing a Student’s Individualized Education Program and Media/Municipal Governments/Senior Citizens.
The next S-GI Board of Education meeting will take place on Feb. 28 at the Springville-GI High School media center at 7 p.m.
2012-02-23 | 07:43:22
school budget
CUT BACK TO THE BASICS, IF YOU WANT YOUR CHILD TO BE IN SPORTS,MUSIC, ART , ETC , LET THE PARENTS PAY FOR IT, THE SAME AS IF THEY WERE TAKING KARATE, DANCE , OR ANY OTHER OUTSIDE THE SCHOOL ACTIVITY.
2012-02-23 | 09:47:59
Music and art
Music and art are curricular subjects. They are mandated by the state.
2012-02-25 | 16:47:39
Time to study merging
The time has come for this district to finally heed what their own budget advisory committee has urged for several years: Close Colden Elementary and merge with neighboring school districts, ie: West Valley and Holland. I understand this question was raised at a recent board meeting and summarily dismissed with the retort, “people don’t like to give up local control.” People don't like to give up their homes either and I don’t recall anyone asking me about merging. There may be many in this community would rather see SGI merge with neighboring (and already purple
2012-02-25 | 16:50:06
Merge cont.
gold) WV and Holland than see the programs we value decimated.
I disagree that the way through this difficult budget is to ask the legislature to lift the tax cap so that SGI may tax us more. SGI has illegally overtaxed this community for years and what did they do with that money? Albany increased aid to school every year for years and what did they do with that money? Would you say the school board has been a judicious steward of the public’s money? Unfortunately, we’ve seen ample evidence that it has not. School officials say the next 2-3 years will be difficult, too, and we need to hang on. Until what? Until we’ve decimated our programs, until the state forces us to merge or create a regional HS? Until we have no choice but to be absorbed by Pioneer because WV and Holland already chose to merge with Elicottville and East Aurora? Until more families move away (notice the number of homes for sale?) and we’re left with a bare bones program, far fewer families and even fewer businesses? Until Albany rescinds the tax cap? I sincerely hope it does not, and I’ve urged my representatives to keep it in place. I also disagree with Mr. Kane’s statement that we must override the tax cap. Doing so would simply give SGI the same blank check it has had for years.
2012-02-25 | 16:52:02
Merge cont.
I promise to vote NO on any budget that fails to stay within the tax cap bounds.
Like reckless teens, schools across the state have already demonstrated they will find ways to spend every dollar they get and continue to ask for more, until their parents finally say no more. Thanks to the tax cap, NY is finally saying no more. Already, seeing which programs are getting cut, and which are left virtually untouched, the superintendent and the board are misjudging this community’s values. Dr. Connelly’s dismissal of the idea of merging also misjudges our values.
It’s a new era in NYS education, and one could argue it’s long overdue. The editorial in Saturday’s Buffalo News says exactly that. http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial-page/article740765.ece Merging does not happen quickly. It must first be studied, evaluated and put to a public vote in each of the involved districts. Let’s begin now. I urge the board to at least commission the study. If you’re unsure of how the voters feel about it, make it a question on this year’s exit poll, before residents place it on the ballot themselves. If you want to learn how to begin, the NYS Education Department offers this guide: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/mgtserv/sch_dist_org/GuideToReorganizationOfSchoolDistricts.htm
2012-02-26 | 10:39:40
Re: Time to Study Merging
I would love to have a conversation with you about your statements. First, do you know that the district has not studied the possibility of merging with neighboring districts, maybe even for years? I can say with direct experience that these conversations are not typically held in open forums because districts who might be considering this are very concerned with the fallout from their community. I think you greatly underestimate the pride and investment even struggling districts have in their own schools and communities. Certainly it is possible and in the future, even likely, that districts might at least become regional or merged, but it’s not simple and sometimes, has not worked as desired. I can say from direct experience that Springville has been open-minded and forward thinking in this area for a number of years. It goes without saying that it takes (at least) two to tango.
Re: “Close Colden Elementary”. What is your rationale for doing so? It’s tough to have the conversation when it’s just a blanket statement. For example, I’m sure that the folks in Colden might remind you that Colden Elementary is the only school in the district with an increasing student enrollment. There is also a significant tax generation from that area that benefits the entire district. It would be easier to consider your proposal if you laid out the reasons for doing so.
Re: “SGI has illegally overtaxed this community and what did they do with the money?” This is a complex idea and the one I would most like to talk with you about. I’m guessing that you are referring to fact that SGI reserve funds exceeded the 4% line in the sand that was put in place by the state regulations. Fair enough, but it is not that simple. While it’s likely we will disagree ultimately, it’s still a tough discussion. SGI did build reserves that exceeded the limit, and that was no secret to anyone who either attended board meetings or budget discussions. In fact, it is worth noting that the yearly tax levy during those years was 0% on a couple of budgets and quite small in other years. Additionally, school boards were receiving mixed messages from regulatory bodies about the 4% limit (I know, the regulation is the regulation- but I can assure you, it’s not that simple). In 2008, when the economy went south, boards were tacitly advised to fund reserves as much as possible anticipating the lack of funding to come. The money that fed those reserve funds came largely from conservative budget planning, unexpected funding sources, and tight fiscal management throughout the years. I can say this, if those funds were not what they were, SGI would be facing even more decimation than they are now, and it would have started last year, not this year.
Re: the tax cap. I would argue that the tax cap is largely a political device to appease angry taxpayers who (rightfully) are concerned about the status quo in NYS. The problem is that without mandate relief from the same folks who brought you the tax cap, the corrosive effect on school district programming, curricular offerings, arts/music/sports, and student-teacher ratios will only get worse. There are burdensome regulations that districts must comply with, without either a predictable, or in some cases, any, corresponding funding to support them. When that occurs, local taxpayers will get the bill.
I’m sure we may have to agree to disagree on many of these matters. It’s likely I feel as strongly as you do about our district and community. Like you, I’m a taxpayer and often not thrilled about that. I am also a strong supporter of our unique community, public education, and am concerned about opportunities for the youngest members of our district. These are tough discussions because almost all of the choices are bad. Thanks for your letter and the resource you mentioned at the end. Finally, if you are going to express strong opinions, why not add your name? It’s hard to have the full and responsible discussion when you don’t put your name on the comments. Peter Sobota, 592-2259 or psobota@buffalo.edu.
2012-03-11 | 13:12:40
Merging
P.S.
You offer not one solution, but many excuses: It is too complicated, too complex and not simple. The law is difficult to understand and it was really just a line in the sand. My taxes are complicated, yet I still pay them.
The basis for suggesting that SGI STUDY and EVALUATE closing Colden and merging with other districts is simple: The Budget Advisory Committee recommended it. Their report was presented at a BOE meeting and is posted online.
The idea that as a board member, you may have discussed the topic of merging with other districts behind closed doors is what disturbs me most. That is a direct violation of the Open Meetings law. This is Sunshine Week. Perhaps this document sheds light:
http://www.thedailymail.net/articles/2011/04/21/ravena_news/news/doc4dacac3802549787592242.txt
2012-03-14 | 12:44:37
re: merging
Hi again. First, I am familiar with the Open Meetings Law. I did not participate in any discussions about merging, and I didn't say that I did. It is still not clear to me why Colden was recommended, the rationale if you will. For example, why Colden and not SES, or any other school for that matter? Regarding solutions, I am accountable for all of the decisions I made during my term on the school board. I made them, and made them in public. By the way, I shared my opinions about the topics raised, but mostly I was asking for a conversation, and provided my name, telephone number, and email. You chose to respond to me anonymously in a blog. So, rather than talk with me about ideas, you criticize me behind anonymity. How about a little more Sunshine in our conversation? Or is this just a case of the pot calling the kettle black? :)
Peter Sobota, 592-2259, psobota@buffalo.edu

email

















